Triveni Sangam Allahabad - All You Need to Know BEFORE You Go (with Photos) - TripAdvisor
The Triveni Sangam, the intersection of Yamuna River and Ganges River. In Hindu tradition Triveni Sangam is the "confluence" (Sangam in Sanskrit) of three rivers. The basic reason for giving the name of a particular river to the combination of the two rivers depends on the volume of water the rivers carry individually. Please select a time at your convenience and let me know when we can meet" or something to that effect would be considered very polite.
Therefore the law has recognized that an idol of the temple is a legal or juristic person," explains Nipun.
These caretakers will be responsible for ensuring the rivers are not misused, abused or misappropriated for personal use. In this case, the Advocate General has been appointed "to personally look into the affairs and manage the board which is to protect and preserve Ganga and Yamuna," says Saxena. For example, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand have come under fire for not taking necessary steps for the protection and preservation of the sacred rivers.
After this ruling, they can be sued on the rivers' behalf. This can potentially make the case for cleaning Ganga and Yamuna stronger, and also lead to a spurt in the number of cases filed in the name of the two rivers.
Boat trip to the meeting of the rivers... - Triveni Sangam Allahabad
The court has appointed the district magistrate and sub-divisional magistrate to ensure implementation of the order. It ordered that the DM be suspended if he fails to comply with the directive. Which makes this ruling the first concrete step to ensure action and accountability. But it's not just this that makes the ruling exceptional. Slaves were considered property rather than persons, and women too were held to be the property of their male relatives. Slavery may have, overtly, vanished from most of the world but in countries like Saudi Arabia men are still considered to be the guardians of the women in families.
Domestic animals, whether livestock or pets, are usually considered to be the property of their owners. But laws against cruelty to animals dilute the absolute rights of owners. In many countries, animals can be taken away from negligent or cruel owners. At the opposite end, loving owners treat their pets as persons, and sometimes explicitly put this into law by bequeathing property to them.
Recently a Mumbai couple was reported to be setting up a.
As David Grimm notes in Citizen Canine, his new book on the evolving personhood of our cats and dogs, the implications are profound: In the late 19th century, as the British were establishing their rule across India, including in matters of property and commercial law, they faced a challenge with temples.
Over centuries, the priests had come to see the temple, and its funds, as belonging to them. If the guardians were misusing their position they could be removed, just as the guardians for a human child could be. This remains the principle on which most temple trusts in India are run. These are truly troubling cases dealing with, for example, a pregnant woman who was a drug addict and whose behaviour the authorities sought to forcibly restrain on the grounds that her habits would injure the foetus.
Even more fundamentally, women who wish to have abortions have been restrained on the grounds that this violated the right to life of the unborn child. This last reason is why anti-abortion activists have fervently tried to make the foetus a legal person, and it shows how the personhood concept can become embroiled in bitter debates.
A clear parallel in India is with cow protection. The numerous laws that prevent the slaughter of cows are, at some level, giving them personhood and it is very easy to see how, with the Ganga and Yamuna achieving legal person status, the same legal principle may be extended.
- Browse Companies
- Your Answer
- Been to Triveni Sangam Allahabad? Share your experiences!
But this points to the problems with legal personhood. For all the value it may have found in the past when applied to corporations and temples, its increasing use now suggests less the triumph of legal persons and more the failure of actual ones. It is because real people have failed to reach agreement on how to deal fairly with rivers, robots, animals and foetuses that activists are turning to legal people to achieve their cause.
Ganga, Yamuna declared human entities: What exactly does this order mean? - FYI News
And this can be understood because the failures are often grievous. Rivers like the Whanganui and the Ganga have been exploited and degraded, animals are horribly abused all the time and, wherever one stands on the issue of abortion, the pain of the process remains.
Yet abandoning attempts to deal with the rights of the real people, in favour of the rights of legal people is both wrong in principle and impractical; the real people and their issues remain and will still have to be dealt with.
How does becoming a person, through a single decision of a court, really change the reality for the Ganges?